I’ve spent many hours trying to puzzle out Google’s product plans. What’s the logic behind Google Drive, how does Motorola fit in a software company, and on and on ( http://moymoycikukecik.blogspot.com /2013/07/google-logic-why-google-does-things-it.html" target="_blank">link). But with the acquisition of Nest, I think I’m going to stop looking for a single product strategy. I believe Google’s mission statement to “organize the world’s information” is no longer a meaningful guide to its actions. To me, the company looks less and less like a unified product company and more and more like a post-modern conglomerate.
The idea behind the “Internet of Things” is that network connectivity is moving into almost everything. If that’s Google’s investment thesis, it could rationalize an investment in almost any industry. Appliances? Absolutely. Shipping and logistics? You bet. Phosphate mining? OK, maybe not that. But any category of products that have electronics in them is fair game, as are any services that rely on data management. That’s going to be most of the economy.
You’re left with no grand product plan, other than the strategy of any conglomerate: Move into hot categories where we can apply our skills and expertise.
If that’s the case, we’ll need to evaluate Google’s strengths and weaknesses differently. We should worry less about the overall grand plan, and more about the management structure of its businesses, the skills of its general managers, and the efficiency of the support staff behind them. In other words, will Google be more like GE or like HP?
Here’s the key question: Does Google know how to manage itself this way? Does it have the right culture, processes, and team strength to run a conglomerate? Does it understand its weaknesses, and have a plan to fix them? For example, maybe the acquisition of Nest is less about its products and more about getting a team that knows how to apply high technology to a low-tech device category (link).
No industry is safe. The answers are crucial to many people. Investors obviously need it to understand whether Google stock is a good buy. VCs need to understand what categories of companies Google might buy. Competitors need to anticipate what Google might do next. And more broadly, the leaders in most industries should ask whether Google is now a competitor to them.
Info Google the Conglomerate: After Nest, No Industry is Safe
By
Unknown
Info Google the Conglomerate: After Nest, No Industry is Safe - this blog we have built from a few years ago and already very much information about gadgets that we convey and a lot of blog visitors New Blog Techno News who are satisfied with the information, we will always try to update the latest information for you, first about Info Google the Conglomerate: After Nest, No Industry is Safe many already we collect data to make this article so you do not miss the news, please see:
Articles : Info Google the Conglomerate: After Nest, No Industry is Safe
full Link : Info Google the Conglomerate: After Nest, No Industry is Safe
Articles : Info Google the Conglomerate: After Nest, No Industry is Safe
full Link : Info Google the Conglomerate: After Nest, No Industry is Safe
You can also see our article on:
Info Google the Conglomerate: After Nest, No Industry is Safe
articles Info Google the Conglomerate: After Nest, No Industry is Safe finished in discussion
hopefully the information we convey about Info Google the Conglomerate: After Nest, No Industry is Safe can benefit you in getting new knowledge about technology,
you just finished reading the information Info Google the Conglomerate: After Nest, No Industry is Safe we hope this informmation can answer the question you submit to googlle, if you want to bookmark or share please use link https://moymoycikukecik.blogspot.com/2014/01/info-google-conglomerate-after-nest-no.html and do not forget to always visit this blog to get the latest information every day.
Tag :
Tags :
Langganan:
Posting Komentar (Atom)
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar